3a513cfe73 caused a reversion in addurl.
The type of addSmall changed, but the void prevented the type checker
from helping notice this. Since it now returns a CommandPerform, the
cleanup action has to be run.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Since bup split is not concurrency safe.
Used a lock file so that 2 git-annex processes only run one bup split
between them (per bup repo).
(Concurrent writes from different git-annex repository clones to the same
bup repo could still have concurrency problems.)
Sponsored-by: Noam Kremen on Patreon
git-annex copy --to a http remote will of course fail, as that's not
supported. But git-annex copy first checks if the content is already
present in the remote, and that threw a "not found".
Looks to me like other remotes that use Url.checkBoth in their checkPresent
do just return false when it fails. And Url.checkBoth does display
errors when unusual errors occur. So I'm pretty sure removing this error
message is ok.
Sponsored-by: Jarkko Kniivilä on Patreon
It seems worth noting here that I emailed bup's author about bup split
being noisy on stderr even with -q in approximately 2011. That never got
fixed. Its current repo on github only accepts pull requests, not bug
reports. Needing to add such complexity to deal with such a longstanding
unfixed issue is not fun.
Sponsored-by: Kevin Mueller on Patreon
Work around bug in git 2.37 that causes a segfault when when
core.untrackedCache is set, and broke git-annex init.
Depending on when git gets fixed and how widely the buggy versions are
used, this could be reverted quite soon, or need to linger for a long time.
It only makes git-annex init a tiny bit slower in a new repo.
Sponsored-by: Max Thoursie on Patreon
This reverts commit b5dc04099e.
Broke windows build, because the new lts updates Win32 to a version that
lacks a function that git-annex needs. git-annex.cabal depends on an
older Win32, and so stack build fails.
Will need to wait to update stack.yaml until this is fixed
https://github.com/haskell/win32/issues/208
and is in a new LTS release.
Fix a reversion that prevented --batch commands (and the assistant)
from noticing data written to the journal by other commands.
I have not identified which commit broke this for sure,
but probably it was aeca7c2207
--batch commands that wrote to the journal avoided the problem since
journalIgnorable sets unset on write. It's a little bit surprising that
nobody noticed that query --batch commands did not see data written by
other commands.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
To avoid using find -printf, which was first supported in Android around
2019-2020.
Probing seems too fragile, and execing stat once per file is too slow to do
when there's a faster way available, which brought me to an option...
Sponsored-by: Brett Eisenberg on Patreon
This caused git to complain that filter-process failed and kill it with
signal 15. Because it wrote an extra flushPkt for an empty file, which
git did not expect, and so git saw an unexpected response to the next
request.
Luckily, filter-process is only used by default in v9 and up, and v8 is
still the default. Also, git had to be updating an empty file, followed
by another file, which is a fairly unlikely situation. And git restarts
filter-process after this happens and uses it to filter the rest of the
files. So this isn't a crippling bug.
Sponsored-by: Luke Shumaker on Patreon
On Windows, that does not support long paths
https://github.com/jacobstanley/unix-compat/issues/56
Instead, use System.Directory.renamePath, which does support long paths.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
