I'm not sure if git documents it aside from 0 and 1, but any integer
can be interpreted as a bool by it. Doing the same in git-annex is good
for consistency. Also, I am planning a config that starts out as a
numeric range, but will later transition to a simple bool (hopefully),
which this interpretation supports well.
An --unlock-present branch reverses back to a branch where
all files that get modified or renamed become locked, even if they were
originally unlocked. This is the same that reversing a --unlock branch
works, and the new name makes that commonality more clear.
There is already one for drop, but move and drop don't handle numcopies
exactly the same, and there was recently a reversion in it checking
numcopies properly at all.
This commit was sponsored by Noam Kremen on Patreon.
Like --hide-missing the branch does not get updated when content
availability changes.
Seems to basically work, but sync does not update it yet.
Also, when a file is present and so unlocked, git mv followed by
git-annex sync results in the basis branch being updated to contain the
file with the new name, unlocked. This seems different than what
happens in an adjusted unlocked branch, where the commit propigates back
locked. Probably the reverse adjustment code needs to be improved to
handle this case.
Note that, the way the SeekInput parser is written to support batch mode,
it's actually possible to do git-annex examinekey
"SHA1--foo foo.tar.gz" --migrate-to-backend=SHA1E
While that might be kind of useful to support multiple migrations not using
batch mode, I have not documented it. It would be better to take pairs of
key and file in that case.
Warn when adding a annex symlink or pointer file that uses a key that is
not known to the repository, to prevent confusion if the user has copied it
from some other repository.
This commit was sponsored by Jake Vosloo on Patreon.
