When an export conflict prevents accessing a special remote, be clearer
about what the problem is and how to resolve it.
This commit was sponsored by Trenton Cronholm on Patreon.
Don't much like that there's no way to distinguish between having the whole
content and having an old version of the file that's bigger, but of course
resuming a http transfer can always yield the wrong result if the file on
the http server is changing, and git-annex will detect that when it
verifies the downloaded content.
This work is supported by the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project.
Fix bash completion of "git annex" to propertly handle files with spaces
and other problem characters. (Completion of "git-annex" already did.)
This commit was sponsored by Jake Vosloo on Patreon.
Finishes the start made in 983c9d5a53, by
handling the case where `transfer` fails for some other reason, and so the
ReadContent callback does not get run. I don't know of a case where
`transfer` does fail other than the locking dealt with in that commit, but
it's good to have a guarantee.
StoreContent and StoreContentTo had a similar problem.
Things like `getViaTmp` may decide not to run the transfer action.
And `transfer` could certianly fail, if another transfer of the same
object was in progress. (Or a different object when annex.pidlock is set.)
If the transfer action was not run, the content of the object would
not all get consumed, and so would get interpreted as protocol commands,
which would not go well.
My approach to fixing all of these things is to set a TVar only
once all the data in the transfer is known to have been read/written.
This way the internals of `transfer`, `getViaTmp` etc don't matter.
So in ReadContent, it checks if the transfer completed.
If not, as long as it didn't throw an exception, send empty and Invalid
data to the callback. On an exception the state of the protocol is unknown
so it has to raise ProtoFailureException and close the connection,
same as before.
In StoreContent, if the transfer did not complete
some portion of the DATA has been read, so the protocol is in an unknown
state and it has to close the conection as well.
(The ProtoFailureMessage used here matches the one in Annex.Transfer, which
is the most likely reason. Not ideal to duplicate it..)
StoreContent did not ever close the protocol connection before. So this is
a protocol change, but only in an exceptional circumstance, and it's not
going to break anything, because clients already need to deal with the
connection breaking at any point.
The way this new behavior looks (here origin has annex.pidlock = true so will
only accept one upload to it at a time):
git annex copy --to origin -J2
copy x (to origin...) ok
copy y (to origin...)
Lost connection (fd:25: hGetChar: end of file)
This work is supported by the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project.
Fix hang when transferring the same objects to two different clients at the
same time. (Or when annex.pidlock is used, two different objects to the
same or different clients.)
Could also potentially occur if a client was downloading an object and
somehow lost connection but that git-annex-shell was still running and
holding the transfer lock.
This does not guarantee that, if `transfer` fails for some other reason,
a DATA response will be made.
This work is supported by the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project.
