Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joey Hess
2f94b5419a
use new name for new format export dbs
Delete the old export dbs on upgrade.

Testing this an exporting to a directory with both exporttree=yes and
importtree=yes, it refused to let an interrupted export proceed after
upgrade, with "unsafe to overwrite file". An import resolved the
problem.
2019-11-06 17:34:15 -04:00
Joey Hess
3b820f08f7
use new name for new format content identifier db
It will be populated automatically by the next command that needs data
from it, the same way it gets populated in a fresh clone. That may be a
little expensive, but it's a one time cost, and no slower than in a
fresh clone.
2019-11-06 16:43:52 -04:00
Joey Hess
1b5f4b67b5
use new name for new format fsck db
The old db is cleaned up when a new incremental fsck is started.

The incremental fsck won't pick up where the old one left off, but I
consider this a minor enough thing that it can just be documented and
won't be a problem.
2019-11-06 16:27:25 -04:00
Joey Hess
dc9295017f
v8 upgrade of keys db
Renamed the database to .git/annex/keysdb;
the old .git/annex/keys gets deleted during the upgrade.

It is possible that an old git-annex process is running during the
upgrade. If so, it will be able to continue using the old keys db until the
upgrade is complete, and then will presumably fail in some ugly way. Or
perhaps the upgrade will be unable to delete the open files on some
systems, and so fail with an ugly error message.

It's also possible for multiple processes to be running the upgrade
concurrently. That should be fine; they will both write the same
information into the keys db.

Other databases still need to be upgraded.
2019-11-06 16:16:00 -04:00