Requires git 1.8.4 or newer. When it's installed, a background
git check-ignore process is run, and used to efficiently check ignores
whenever a new file is added.
Thanks to Adam Spiers, for getting the necessary support into git for this.
A complication is what to do about files that are gitignored but have
been checked into git anyway. git commands assume the ignore has been
overridden in this case, and not need any more overriding to commit a
changed version.
However, for the assistant to do the same, it would have to run git ls-files
to check if the ignored file is in git. This is somewhat expensive. Or it
could use the running git-cat-file process to query the file that way,
but that requires transferring the whole file content over a pipe, so it
can be quite expensive too, for files that are not git-annex
symlinks.
Now imagine if the user knows that a file or directory tree will be getting
frequent changes, and doesn't want the assistant to sync it, so gitignores
it. The assistant could overload the system with repeated ls-files checks!
So, I've decided that the assistant will not automatically commit changes
to files that are gitignored. This is a tradeoff. Hopefully it won't be a
problem to adjust .gitignore settings to not ignore files you want the
assistant to autocommit, or to manually git annex add files that are listed
in .gitignore.
(This could be revisited if git-annex gets access to an interface to check
the content of the index w/o forking a git command. This could be libgit2,
or perhaps a separate git cat-file --batch-check process, so it wouldn't
need to ship over the whole file content.)
This commit was sponsored by Francois Marier. Thanks!
This runs git-cat-file in non-batch mode for all files with spaces.
If a directory tree has a lot of them, and is in direct mode, even "git
annex add" when there are few new files will need a *lot* of forks!
The only reason buffering the whole file content to get the sha is not a
memory leak is that git-annex only ever uses this on symlinks.
This needs to be reverted as soon as a fix is available in git!
A git pathspec is a filename, except when it starts with ':', it's taken
to refer to a branch, etc. Rather than special case ':', any filename
starting with anything unusual is prefixed with "./"
This could have been a real mess to deal with, but luckily SafeCommand
is already extensively used and so we know at the type level the difference
between parameters that are files, and parameters that are command options.
Testing did show that Git.Queue was not using SafeCommand on
filenames fed to xargs. (Filenames starting with '-' worked before only
because -- was used to separate filenames from options when calling eg git
add.)
The test suite now passes with filenames starting with ':'. However, I did
not keep that change to it, because such filenames are probably not legal
on windows, and I have enough ugly windows ifdefs in there as it is.
This commit was sponsored by Otavio Salvador. Thanks!
Fuzz tests have shown that git cat-file --batch sometimes stops running.
It's not yet known why (no error message; repo seems ok). But this is
something we can deal with in the CoProcess framework, since all 3 types of
long-running git processes should be restartable if they fail.
Note that, as implemented, only IO errors are caught. So an error thrown
by the reveiver, when it sees something that is not valid output from
git cat-file (etc) will not cause a restart. I don't want it to retry
if git commands change their output or are just outputting garbage.
This does mean that if the command did a partial output and crashed in the
middle, it would still not be restarted.
There is currently no guard against restarting a command repeatedly, if,
for example, it crashes repeatedly on startup.
That's needed in files used to build the configure program.
For the other files, I'm keeping my __WINDOWS__ define, as I find that much easier to type.
I may search and replace it to use the mingw32_HOST_OS thing later.
Pass subcommand as a regular param, which allows passing git parameters
like -c before it. This was already done in the pipeing set of functions,
but not the command running set.
Two fixes. First, and most importantly, relax the isLinkToAnnex check
to only look for /annex/objects/, not [^|/].git/annex/objects. If
GIT_DIR is used with a detached work tree, the git directory is
not necessarily named .git.
There are important caveats with doing that at all, since git-annex will
make symlinks that point at GIT_DIR, which means that the relative path
between GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE needs to remain stable across all clones
of the repository.
----
The other fix is just fixing crazy and wrong code that, when GIT_DIR is
set, expects to still find a git repository in the path below the work
tree, and uses some of its configuration, and some of GIT_DIR. What was I
thinking, and why can't I seem to get this code right?
Making the pre-commit hook look at git diff-index to find changed direct
mode files and update the mappings works pretty well.
One case where it does not work is when a file is git annex added, and then
git rmed, and then this is committed. That's a no-op commit, so the hook
probably doesn't even run, and it certianly never notices that the file
was deleted, so the mapping will still have the original filename in it.
For this and other reasons, it's important that the mappings still be
treated as possibly inconsistent.
Also, the assistant now allows the pre-commit hook to run when in direct
mode, so the mappings also get updated there.
New setting, can be used to disable autocommit of changed files by the
assistant, while it still does data syncing and other tasks.
Also wired into webapp UI
Union merges involving two or more repositories could sometimes result in
data from one repository getting lost. This could result in the location
log data becoming wrong, and fsck being needed to fix it.
NB: I audited for any other occurrences of this problem. There are other
places than union merge where multiple changes are fed into update-index
in a stream, but they all involve working copy files being staged, or their
deletion being staged, and in this case it's fine for the later changes
to override the earlier ones.
git add --update cannot be used, because it'll stage typechanged direct
mode files. Intead, use ls-files to find deleted files, and stage them
ourselves.
It seems that no commit was made before when the scan staged deleted files.
(Probably masked since if files were added, a commit happened then..)
Now that I'm doing the staging, I was also able to fix that bug.
