Used by the assistant, rather than copy, this is faster because it avoids
using git ls-files, avoids checking the location log redundantly, and
runs in oneshot mode, avoiding making a commit to the git-annex branch
for every file transferred.
There are multiple reasons to do this:
* The local network may be up solid, but a route to a networked remote
is having trouble. Any transfers to it that fail should be retried.
* Someone might have wicd running, but like to bring up new networks
by hand too. This way, it'll eventually notice them.
The problem with using it here is that, if a removable drive is scanned
and gets disconnected during the scan, testing for all the files will
indicate it doesn't have them, and the scan is logged as completed
successfully, without necessary transfers being queued.
Found a very cheap way to determine when a disconnected remote has
diverged, and has new content that needs to be transferred: Piggyback on
the git-annex branch update, which already checks for divergence.
However, this does not check if new content has appeared locally while
disconnected, that should be transferred to the remote.
Also, this does not handle cases where the two git repos are in sync,
but their content syncing has not caught up yet.
This code could have its efficiency improved:
* When multiple remotes are synced, if any one has diverged, they're
all queued for transfer scans.
* The transfer scanner could be told whether the remote has new content,
the local repo has new content, or both, and could optimise its scan
accordingly.
This deals with interruptions in network connectevity, by listening
for a new network interface coming up (using dbus to see when
network-manager or wicd do it), and forcing a rescan of
