Large speed up to importing trees from special remotes that contain a lot
of files, by only processing changed files.
Benchmarks:
Importing from a special remote that has 10000 files, that have all been
imported before, and 1 new file sped up from 26.06 to 2.59 seconds.
An import with no change and 10000 unchanged files sped up from 24.3 to
1.99 seconds.
Going up to 20000 files, an import with no changes sped up from
125.95 to 3.84 seconds.
Sponsored-by: k0ld on Patreon
Consistency with sync and internal consistency is more important than
consistency with the assistant, which is not itself consistent about
what it does when run in a subdirectory.
Note that with -C, it will still commit staged changes to files outside
the directory. Like sync does. Presumably if the user is manually
staging things, then running this command, they intend to build up a
commit.
Sponsored-by: unqueued on Patreon
assist: New command, which is the same as git-annex sync but with
new files added and content transferred by default.
(Also this fixes another reversion in git-annex sync,
--commit --no-commit, and --message were not enabled, oops.)
See added comment for why git-annex assist does commit staged
changes elsewhere in the work tree, but only adds files under
the cwd.
Note that it does not support --no-commit, --no-push, --no-pull
like sync does. My thinking is, why should it? If you want that
level of control, use git commit, git annex push, git annex pull.
Sync only got those options because pull and push were not split
out.
Sponsored-by: k0ld on Patreon
When used without --content or --no-content, warn about the upcoming
transition, and suggest using one of the options, or setting
annex.synccontent.
Sponsored-by: Brett Eisenberg on Patreon
Split out two new commands, git-annex pull and git-annex push. Those plus a
git commit are equivilant to git-annex sync.
In a sense, git-annex sync conflates 3 things, and it would have been
better to have push and pull from the beginning and not sync. Although
note that git-annex sync --content is faster than a pull followed by a
push, because it only has to walk the tree once, look at preferred
content once, etc. So there is some value in git-annex sync in speed, as
well as user convenience.
And it would be hard to split out pull and push from sync, as far as the
implementaton goes. The implementation inside sync was easy, just adjust
SyncOptions so it does the right thing.
Note that the new commands default to syncing content, unless
annex.synccontent is explicitly set to false. I'd like sync to also do
that, but that's a hard transition to make. As a start to that
transition, I added a note to git-annex-sync.mdwn that it may start to
do so in a future version of git-annex. But a real transition would
necessarily involve displaying warnings when sync is used without
--content, and time.
Sponsored-by: Kevin Mueller on Patreon
Had to convert uninit to do everything that can error out inside a
CommandStart. This was harder than feels nice.
(Also, in passing, converted CommandCheck to use a data type, not a
weird number that it was not clear how it managed to be unique.)
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
Seems unlikely to be too useful, but who knows.
Moved the checkSafeConfig call to happen after an action is started, so
it will be captured by --json-error-messages
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
Including special --whatelse handling.
Otherwise, it seems unlikely to be too useful, but who knows.
Refactored code to call starting before displaying error messages.
This makes the error messages be captured by --json-error-messages
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
Seems unlikely to be very useful, but trivial.
And, this completes the story that git-annex sync does not need json,
since every sub-operation is available in a command that does support json.
(Well, except for committing, but that's not a git-annex command.)
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
Both -J and --json needed importfeed to be refactored to use commandAction.
That was difficult, because of the interrelated nature of downloading feeds
and then downloading files from feeds, both of which needed to use
commandAction. And then checking for problems in feeds has to come after
these actions, which may be run as background jobs.
As for --json support, it's most of the way there, but still has some
warts, so I didn't enable jsonOptions yet. The warts include:
- An initial empty json record is displayed by getCache.
- Input is not populated, should be feed url
- feedProblem at end will not be captured by --json-error-messages
(see FIXME)
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
Also fix support for operating on multiple pairs of files and keys.
Moved notAnnexed to inside starting, so error message will get into the json.
Cannot include the key in the starting as it's not known yet, so instead
add it to the json later.
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
Dunno how useful this will be, since about all that's accessible from
the json is whether it succeeded or failed, and the error messages
which were already on stderr.
Note that, when autoenabling a special remote, it would be possible for
one to stop and prompt or output not using Messages and so not output as
part of the json. I don't think that happens, but I'm not 100% sure
something doesn't manage to break it. Of course, the same could be the
case for commands that transfer objects. Using Annex.Init.autoEnableSpecialRemotes
in --json mode would avoid the problem, but I've chosen to wait until I
know it's needed to use it.
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
Generalized AddJSONActionItemField to allow it to add several fields. Not entirely
happy with that, since the names of the fields have to be carefully chosen to
not conflict with other json fields. And fields added that way can't be parsed
back in FromJSON, except for the "fields" field that is special cased for metadata.
Still, I couldn't see another way to do it.
Also, omit file:null from the json output. Which does affect other commands,
eg git-annex whereis --all --json. Hopefully that won't break something that expects
a null file. If it did, that could be reverted, but it would be ugly to have
file:null in the unused --json
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
For expire, the normal output is unchanged, but the --json output includes the uuid
in machine parseable form. Which could be very useful for this somewhat obscure
command. That needed ActionItemUUID to be implemented, which seemed like a lot
of work, but then ---
I had been going to skip implementing them for trust, untrust, dead, semitrust,
and describe, but putting the uuid in the json is useful information, it tells
what uuid git-annex picked given the input. It was not hard to support
these once ActionItemUUID was implemented.
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
This also changes addunused to display the names of the files that it adds.
That seems like a general usability improvement, and not displaying the input
number does not seem likely to be a problem to a user, since the filename
is based on the key. Displaying the filename was necessary to get it and the key
included in the json.
dropunused does not include the key in the json. It would be possible to
add, but would need more changes. And I doubt that dropunused --json
would be used in a situation where a program cared which keys were
dropped. Note that drop --unused does have the key in its json, so such
a program could just use it. Or could just dropkey --batch with the
specific keys it wants to drop if it cares about specific keys.
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
