When upgrading a direct mode repo to v7 with adjusted unlocked branches,
fix a bug that prevented annex.thin from taking effect for the files in
working tree.
The hard links used to be ok, but commit 8e22114735 accidentially
broke them. It repopulates the worktree file, which is already a hard link,
and when it's creating the new file, the link count is already 2, and so it
doesn't make a hard link then.
Rather than direct mode, which this is a small step on the path to
removing.
Init on a crippled filesystem already used v7 adjusted branches,
and like that, this doesn't pose any interoperability issues with old
versions of git-annex that clone the same repo, because files are only
unlocked on the adjusted branch.
When file matching options are specified when getting info of
something other than a directory, they won't have any effect, so error out
to avoid confusion.
This commit was sponsored by mo on Patreon.
Turns out that 7be690f326 broke the
test suite on the i386ancient builder. There, git show-ref --verify HEAD
fails with "'HEAD' - not a valid ref". Apparently git 2.1.4 didn't
support that.
headExists works there and does the same thing.
This code was already AGPL, except for the bit split out
to Utility/MD5.hs in commit 426053cb6c.
That commit accidentially updated the license of this file from AGPL
to GPL.
Thanks to Sean Whitton for spotting this.
Systems such as Debian that have overridden the default fpath will need to
set ZSH_COMPLETIONS_PATH.
I feel that Debian is causing unncessary complexity by making this change,
and have filed a bug report about it.
This also means that when git-annex is installed with PREFIX=/usr/local
it will use /usr/local/share/zsh/site-functions which works with probably
all versions of zsh.
Its repeated opening and writing to the sqlite database somehow caused
inode cache information to occasionally be lost.
This loses code coverage, since running git-annex as a child process
prevents tracking what parts of the code are exercised. I have not looked
at the code coverage in a long time. It would probably be possible to
collect code coverage for the child procesess and merge it together.
