As was attempted earlier in the buggy commit 0d2e3058ee
Avoided the bug that had by making the upgrade log be updated after each
upgrade step. So, after upgrade from v8 to v9, the log is updated, and
so Upgrade.V9's timeOfUpgrade check will find that it was upgraded
recently and so won't let it skip ahead to v10.
Sponsored-by: k0ld on Patreon
This is much easier and less failure-prone than having the user run
git update-index --refresh themselves.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
Fixes updating git index file after getting an unlocked file when
annex.stalldetection is set.
The transferrer may want to send additional protocol messages when it's
shut down. Closing the read handle prevented it from doing that, and caused
it to crash rather than cleanly shutting down.
Draining the handle without processing the protocol seemed ok to do,
because anything it outputs is going to be some side message displayed
at shutdown. Displaying those once per transferrer process that is running
seems unncessary.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
When concurrency is enabled, there can be worker threads still running
when the time limit is checked. Exiting right there does not
give those threads time to finish what they're doing. Instead, the seeking
is wrapped up, and git-annex then shuts down cleanly.
The whole point of --time-limit existing, rather than using timeout(1)
when running git-annex is to let git-annex finish the action(s) it is
working on when the time limit is reached, and shut down cleanly.
I noticed this problem when investigating why restagePointerFile might
not have run after get/drop of an unlocked file. With --time-limit -J,
a worker thread may have finished updating a work tree file, and be killed
by the time limit check before it can run restagePointerFile. So despite
--time-limit running the shutdown actions, the work tree file didn't get
restaged.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
It's hard to know what's a good default for this. But 1 mb seems way too
small, because it's very easy for a git pull or some similar operation
that we don't think of as using much space to use up 1 mb of space.
Most people would want to free up some space if a filesystem only had 100
mb free. But on a small VPS, it's probably not uncommon to have only 1 gb
free. So 1 gb is too large for annex.diskreserve.
While old 1 gb USB keys are around, it's unlikely that anyone is
relying on them to shuttle annex data around; it would be worth anyone's
time to upgrade to a 32 gb or larger cheap modern USB key ($5).
Sponsored-by: Kevin Mueller on Patreon
