On Windows, that does not support long paths
https://github.com/jacobstanley/unix-compat/issues/56
Instead, use System.Directory.renamePath, which does support long paths.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
The webapp modules cannot build with the assistant disabled, so make the
webapp be under the assistant build flag.
Sponsored-by: Jarkko Kniivilä on Patreon
Recent commit got amended accidentially to include this typo. Argh. It
was fine, then I tweakd the commit message and accidentially staged this
breakage.
As outlined in my blog post, I object to Microsoft training their Copilot
model on my code, and believe it likely violates my copyright.
https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/a_bitter_pill_for_Microsoft_Copilot/
While I never push git-annex to Github, other users choose to. And since
Microsoft is now selling access to Copilot to anyone, this situation is
escalating.
Some small wins, almost certianly swamped by the system calls, but still
worthwhile progress on the RawFilePath conversion.
Sponsored-by: Erik Bjäreholt on Patreon
setEnv is not thread safe and could cause a getEnv by another thread to
segfault, or perhaps other had behavior.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Added support for "megabit" and related bandwidth units in
annex.stalldetection and everywhere else that git-annex parses data units.
Note that the short form is "Mbit" not "Mb" because that differs from "MB"
only in case, and git-annex parses units case-insensitively. It would be
horrible if two different versions of git-annex parsed the same value
differently, so I don't think "Mb" can be supported.
See comment for bonus sad story from my childhood.
Sponsored-by: Nicholas Golder-Manning
If the temp directory can somehow contain a hard link, it changes the
mode, which affects all other hard linked files. So, it's too unsafe
to use everywhere in git-annex, since hard links are possible in
multiple ways and it would be very hard to prove that every place that
uses a temp directory cannot possibly put a hard link in it.
Added a call to removeDirectoryForCleanup to test_crypto, which will
fix the problem that commit 17b20a2450
was intending to fix, with a much smaller hammer.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Using removePathForcibly avoids concurrent removal problems.
The i386ancient build still uses an old version of ghc and directory that
do not include removePathForcibly though.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
prop_relPathDirToFileAbs_basics (TestableFilePath ":/") failed on
windows. The colon was filtered out after trying to make
the path relative, which only removed leading path separators.
So, ":/" changed to "/" which is not relative. Filtering out the colon
before hand avoids this problem.
Sponsored-by: Luke Shumaker on Patreon
Removed vendored copy of http-client-restricted, and removed the
HttpClientRestricted build flag that avoided that dependency.
http-client-restricted is in Debian stable, and the i386ancient build also
uses it, so I think this vendored copy is no longer needed.
Sponsored-by: Noam Kremen on Patreon
In aeson 2.0, Text has been replaced by the Key type and HashMap by the
KeyMap interface. Accomodating this required adding some CPP in order to
still be able to compile with aeson < 2.0. The required changes were:
* Prevent Key from being re-exported by Utilities.Aeson, as it clashes
with git-annex's own Key type.
* Fix up convertion from String/Text to Key (or Text in aeson 1.*) in a
couple of places
* Import Data.Aeson.KeyMap instead of Data.HashMap.Strict, as they are
mostly API-compatible. insertWith needs to be replaced by unionWith,
however, as KeyMap lacks the former function.
This fixes a FD leak when annex.pidlock is set and -J is used. Also, it
fixes bugs where the pid lock file got deleted because one thread was
done with it, while another thread was still holding it open.
The LockPool now has two distinct types of resources,
one is per-LockHandle and is used for file Handles, which get closed
when the associated LockHandle is closed. The other one is per lock
file, and gets closed when no more LockHandles use that lock file,
including other shared locks of the same file.
That latter kind is used for the pid lock file, so it's opened by the
first thread to use a lock, and closed when the last thread closes a lock.
In practice, this means that eg git-annex get of several files opens and
closes the pidlock file a few times per file. While with -J5 it will open
the pidlock file, process a number of files, until all the threads happen to
finish together, at which point the pidlock file gets closed, and then
that repeats. So in either case, another process still gets a chance to
take the pidlock.
registerPostRelease has a rather intricate dance, there are fine-grained
STM locks, a STM lock of the pidfile itself, and the actual pidlock file
on disk that are all resolved in stages by it.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
This reverts commit 66b2536ea0.
I misunderstood commit ac56a5c2a0
and caused a FD leak when pid locking is not used.
A LockHandle contains an action that will close the underlying lock
file, and that action is run when it is closed. In the case of a shared
lock, the lock file is opened once for each LockHandle, and only
the one for the LockHandle that is being closed will be closed.
This locking has been missing from the beginning of annex.pidlock.
It used to be possble, when two threads are doing conflicting things,
for both to run at the same time despite using locking. Seems likely
that nothing actually had a problem, but it was possible, and this
eliminates that possible source of failure.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Seem there are several races that happen when 2 threads run PidLock.tryLock
at the same time. One involves checkSaneLock of the side lock file, which may
be deleted by another process that is dropping the lock, causing checkSaneLock
to fail. And even with the deletion disabled, it can still fail, Probably due
to linkToLock failing when a second thread overwrites the lock file.
The same can happen when 2 processes do, but then one process just fails
to take the lock, which is fine. But with 2 threads, some actions where failing
even though the process as a whole had the pid lock held.
Utility.LockPool.PidLock already maintains a STM lock, and since it uses
LockShared, 2 threads can hold the pidlock at the same time, and when
the first thread drops the lock, it will remain held by the second
thread, and so the pid lock file should not get deleted until the last
thread to hold it drops the lock. Which is the right behavior, and why a
LockShared STM lock is used in the first place.
The problem is that each time it takes the STM lock, it then also calls
PidLock.tryLock. So that was getting called repeatedly and concurrently.
Fixed by noticing when the shared lock is already held, and stop calling
PidLock.tryLock again, just use the pid lock that already exists then.
Also, LockFile.PidLock.tryLock was deleting the pid lock when it failed
to take the lock, which was entirely wrong. It should only drop the side
lock.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
This fixes a reversion introduced in commit
ac56a5c2a0.
I didn't notice there that it was handling the case of a shared lock
file that was still open elsewhere by not running the close action.
This was especially deadly when annex.pidlock is set, as it caused early
deletion of the pid lock file.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
It ought to exist, since linkToLock has just created it. However,
Lustre seems to have a rather probabilisitic view of the contents of a
directory, so catching the error if it somehow does not exist and
running the same code path that would be ran if linkToLock failed
might avoid this fun Lustre failure.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
git-lfs: Fix interoperability with gitlab's implementation of the git-lfs
protocol, which requests Content-Encoding chunked.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Caused by dirContains ".." "foo" being incorrectly False.
Also added a test of dirContains, which includes all the previous bug fixes
I could find and some obvious cases.
Reversion in version 8.20211011
Sponsored-by: Brett Eisenberg on Patreon
When the progress display gets longer, and then shorter again, it causes
the cursor to jitter back and forth. Somehow I never noticed this until
this morning, but then it became intolerable to watch.
To fix it, pad the progress display to the maximum length it's occupied.
Sponsored-by: Svenne Krap on Patreon
dirContains ".." "../.." was incorrectly True.
This does not seem to be an exploitable security hole, at least
as dirContains is used in git-annex.
Sponsored-by: Jochen Bartl on Patreon
This method avoids breaking test_readonly. Just check if the dest file
exists, and avoid CoW probing when it does, so when CoW probing fails,
it can resume where the previous non-CoW copy left off.
If CoW has been probed already to work, delete the dest file
since a CoW copy will presumably work. It seems like it would be almost
as good to just skip CoW copying in this case too, but consider that the
dest file might have started to be copied from some other remote, not
using CoW, but CoW has been probed to work to copy from the current
place.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
commit 63d508e885 broke test_readonly.
When a local git remote is readonly, tryCopyCoW run to copy a file
from it failed at withOtherTmp.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
I first saw this getting with -J2 over ssh, but later saw it also
without the -J2. It was resuming, and the calulated unboundDelay was
many minutes. The first update of the meter jumped to some large value,
because of the resuming, and so it thought the BW was super fast.
Avoid by waiting until the second meter update.
Might be a good idea to also guard for the delay being many seconds
and avoid waiting. But how many? If BW is legitimately super fast, and a
remote happens to read more than a 32kb or so chunk at a time, it could
in theory download megabytes or gigabytes of data before the first meter
update. It would actually be appropriate then to delay for a long time,
if the desired BW was low. Could make up some numbers that are sane now,
but tech may improve.
(BTW, pleased to see bwlimit does work with -J. I had worried that
it might not, if the meter update happened in a different thread than
the downloading, but it's done in the same thread.)
Sponsored-by: Brett Eisenberg on Patreon
New method is much better. Avoids unrestrained transfer at the beginning
(except for the first block. Keeps right at or a few kb/s below the
configured limit, with very little varation in the actual reported bandwidth.
Removed the /s part of the config as it's not needed.
Ready to merge.
Sponsored-by: Luke Shumaker on Patreon
Probably this fixes a reversion, but I don't know what version broke it.
This does use withOtherTmp for a temp file that could be quite large.
Though albeit a reflink copy that will not actually take up any space
as long as the file it was copied from still exists. So if the copy cow
succeeds but git-annex is interrupted just before that temp file gets
renamed into the usual .git/annex/tmp/ location, there is a risk that
the other temp directory ends up cluttered with a larger temp file than
later. It will eventually be cleaned up, and the changes of this being
a problem are small, so this seems like an acceptable thing to do.
Sponsored-by: Shae Erisson on Patreon
Added annex.bwlimit and remote.name.annex-bwlimit config that works for git
remotes and many but not all special remotes.
This nearly works, at least for a git remote on the same disk. With it set
to 100kb/1s, the meter displays an actual bandwidth of 128 kb/s, with
occasional spikes to 160 kb/s. So it needs to delay just a bit longer...
I'm unsure why.
However, at the beginning a lot of data flows before it determines the
right bandwidth limit. A granularity of less than 1s would probably improve
that.
And, I don't know yet if it makes sense to have it be 100ks/1s rather than
100kb/s. Is there a situation where the user would want a larger
granularity? Does granulatity need to be configurable at all? I only used that
format for the config really in order to reuse an existing parser.
This can't support for external special remotes, or for ones that
themselves shell out to an external command. (Well, it could, but it
would involve pausing and resuming the child process tree, which seems
very hard to implement and very strange besides.) There could also be some
built-in special remotes that it still doesn't work for, due to them not
having a progress meter whose displays blocks the bandwidth using thread.
But I don't think there are actually any that run a separate thread for
downloads than the thread that displays the progress meter.
Sponsored-by: Graham Spencer on Patreon
This was maybe a real bug too, although I don't know what circumstances
it would be a problem. See comment for analysis of this windows drive
letter wackyness issue.
Sponsored-by: Brock Spratlen on Patreon
This is to track down what file in .git/annex/ is being written to via a
temp file when the repository is read-only.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Except when configuration makes curl be used. It did not seem worth
trying to tail the file when curl is downloading.
But when an interrupted download is resumed, it does not read the whole
existing file to hash it. Same reason discussed in
commit 7eb3742e4b76d1d7a487c2c53bf25cda4ee5df43; that could take a long
time with no progress being displayed. And also there's an open http
request, which needs to be consumed; taking a long time to hash the file
might cause it to time out.
Also in passing implemented it for git and external special remotes when
downloading from the web. Several others like S3 are within striking
distance now as well.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
