Failure to remove is not treated as a problem, and no permissions
modifications are done, to avoid unexpected states.
Sponsored-by: Luke Shumaker on Patreon
* S3: Amazon S3 buckets created after April 2023 do not support ACLs,
so public=yes cannot be used with them. Existing buckets configured
with public=yes will keep working.
* S3: Allow setting publicurl=yes without public=yes, to support
buckets that are configured with a Bucket Policy that allows public
access.
Sponsored-by: Joshua Antonishen on Patreon
This causes changes to the original branch to get merged with a single
sync. Before, it took 2 syncs; the first happened to update the synced/
branch, and the second merged changes from the synced/ branch into the
ajusted branch.
Using mergeToAdjustedBranch when tomerge == origbranch is probably
overkill, but it does work fine.
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
Bug fix: Re-running git-annex adjust or sync when in an adjusted branch
would overwrite the original branch, losing any commits that had been made
to it since the adjusted branch was created.
When git-annex adjust is run in this situation, it will display a warning
about the diverged branches.
When git-annex sync is run in this situation, mergeToAdjustedBranch
will merge the changes from the original branch to the adjusted branch.
So it does not need to display the divergence warning.
Note that for some reason, I'm needing to run sync twice for that to
happen. The first run does not do the merge and the second does. I'm unsure
why and so am not fully done with this bug.
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
Running git config --list inside .git then fails, so better to only
do that when --git-dir was specified explicitly. Otherwise, when the
repository is not bare, run the command inside the working tree.
Also make init detect when the uuid it just set cannot be read and fail
with an error, in case git changes something that breaks this later.
I still don't actually understand why git-annex add/assist -J2 was
affected but -J1 was not. But I did show that it was skipping writing to
the location log, because the uuid was NoUUID.
Sponsored-by: Graham Spencer on Patreon
Command.Add.seek starts concurrency with CommandStages. And for
Command.Sync, it needs TransferStages. So, to get both types of concurrency
for the two different parts, it either needs to change the type of
concurrency in between, or just call startConcurrency once for each.
It seems safe enough to call startConcurrency twice, because it does shut
down concurrency (mostly) at the end, and eg the old Annex.workers get
emptied.
Sponsored-by: unqueued on Patreon
