This was caused by commit fb8ab2469d putting
an isPointerFile check in the wrong place. So if the file was not a pointer
file at that point, but got replaced by one before the file got locked
down, the pointer file would be ingested into the annex.
The fix is simply to move the isPointerFile check to after safeToAdd locks
down the file. Now if the file changes to a pointer file after the
isPointerFile check, ingestion will see that it changed after lockdown,
and will refuse to add it to the annex.
Sponsored-by: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
The error message is not displayed to the use, but this mirrors the
behavior when a regular get from a special remote fails. At least now
there is not a protocol error.
Now that storeKey can have a different object file passed to it, this
complication is not needed. This avoids a lot of strange situations,
and will also be needed if streaming is eventually supported.
Wanted to also list a cluster's nodes when showing info for the cluster,
but that's hard because it needs getting the name of the proxying
remote, which is some prefix of the cluster's name, but if the names
contain dashes there's no good way to know which prefix it is.
Still needs some work.
The reason that the waitv is necessary is because without it,
runNet loops back around and reads the next protocol message. But it's
not finished reading the whole bytestring yet, and so it reads some part
of it.
Working, but lots of room for improvement...
Without streaming, so there is a delay before download begins as the
file is retreived from the special remote.
And when resuming it retrieves the whole file from the special remote
*again*.
Also, if the special remote throws an exception, currently it
shows as "protocol error".
This allows an error message from a proxied special remote to be
displayed to the client.
In the case where removal from several nodes of a cluster fails,
there can be several errors. What to do? I decided to only show
the first error to the user. Probably in this case the user is not in a
position to do anything about an error message, so best keep it simple.
If the problem with the first node is fixed, they'll see the error from
the next node.
That error is now rethrown on the client, so it will be displayed.
For example:
$ git-annex fsck x --fast --from AMS-dir
fsck x (special remote reports: directory /home/joey/tmp/bench2/dir is not accessible) failed
No protocol version check is needed. Because in order to talk to a
proxied special remote, the client has to be running the upcoming
git-annex release. Which has this fix in it.
This is early, but already working for CHECKPRESENT.
However, when the special remote throws an exception on checkPresent,
this happens:
[2024-06-28 13:22:18.520884287] (P2P.IO) [ThreadId 4] P2P > ERROR directory /home/joey/tmp/bench2/dir is not accessible
[2024-06-28 13:22:18.521053135] (P2P.IO) [ThreadId 4] P2P < ERROR expected SUCCESS or FAILURE
git-annex: client error: expected SUCCESS or FAILURE
(fixing location log) p2pstdio: 1 failed
** Based on the location log, x
** was expected to be present, but its content is missing.
failed
This will allow having an internal thread speaking P2P protocol,
which will be needed to support proxying to external special remotes.
No serialization is done on the internal P2P protocol of course.
When a ByteString is being exchanged, it may or may not be exactly
the length indicated by DATA. While that has to be carefully managed
for the serialized P2P protocol, here it would require buffering the
whole lazy bytestring in memory to check its length when sending,
so it's better to do length checks on the receiving side.
This makes eg git-annex get default to using the cluster rather than an
arbitrary node, which is better UI.
The actual cost of accessing a proxied node vs using the cluster is
basically the same. But using the cluster allows smarter load-balancing
to be done on the cluster.
Before it was using a node that might have had a higher cost.
Also threw in a random selection from amoung the low cost nodes. Of
course this is a poor excuse for load balancing, but it's better than
nothing. Most of the time...
