Rather than using Read/Show, which would force me to preserve data types
into the future.
I considered just deriving json and sending that, but I don't much like
deriving json with data types that have named constructors (like Key
does) because again it locks in data type details.
So instead, used SimpleProtocol, with a fairly complex and unreadable
protocol. But it is as efficient as the p2p protocol at least, and as
future proof.
(Writing my own custom json instances would have worked but I thought
of it too late and don't want to do all the work twice. The only real
benefit might be that aeson could be faster.)
Note that, when a new protocol request type is added later, git-annex
trying to use it will cause the git-annex transferrer to display a
protocol error message. That seems ok; it would only happen if a new
git-annex found an old version of itself in PATH or the program
file. So it's unlikely, and all it can do anyway is display an error.
(The error message could perhaps be improved..)
This commit was sponsored by Jack Hill on Patreon.
This is to avoid breakage when upgrading or downgrading git-annex with a
process running that uses the interface. It's better to keep the
compatability code for a few years than worry about such breakage.
This commit was sponsored by Brett Eisenberg on Patreon.
New config annex.stalldetection, remote.name.annex-stalldetection, which
can be used to deal with remotes that stall during transfers, or are
sometimes too slow to want to use.
This commit was sponsored by Luke Shumaker on Patreon.
This old code will now be useful for git-annex beyond the assistant.
git-annex won't use the CheckTransferrer part, and won't run transferkeys
as a batch process, and will want withTransferrer to not shut down
transferkeys processes. Still, the rest of this is a good fit for what I
need now.
Also removed some dead code, and simplified a little bit.
This commit was sponsored by Mark Reidenbach on Patreon.
That seems to be the last thing needed for message serialization.
Although it's only used in the assistant currently, so hard to tell if I
forgot something.
At this point, it should be possible to start using transferkeys
when performing transfers, which will allow killing a transferkeys
process if a transfer times out or stalls. But that's for another day.
This commit was sponsored by Ethan Aubin.
Any given transfer can only display 1 progress meter at a time, or so
this code assumes. In some cases, there are progress meters for
different stages of a transfer, perhaps, and that is supported by this.
This commit was sponsored by Ethan Aubin.
Necessarily threw out the old protocol, so if an old git-annex assistant
is running, and starts a transferkeys from the new git-annex, it would
fail. But, that seems unlikely; the assistant starts up transferkeys
processes and then keeps them running. Still, may need to test that
scenario.
The new protocol is simple read/show and looks like this:
TransferRequest Download (Right "origin") (Key {keyName = "f8f8766a836fb6120abf4d5328ce8761404e437529e997aaa0363bdd4fecd7bb", keyVariety = SHA2Key (HashSize 256) (HasExt True), keySize = Just 30, keyMtime = Nothing, keyChunkSize = Nothing, keyChunkNum = Nothing}) (AssociatedFile (Just "foo"))
TransferOutput (ProgressMeter (Just 30) (MeterState {meterBytesProcessed = BytesProcessed 0, meterTimeStamp = 1.6070268727892535e9}) (MeterState {meterBytesProcessed = BytesProcessed 30, meterTimeStamp = 1.6070268728043e9}))
TransferOutput (OutputMessage "(checksum...) ")
TransferResult True
Granted, this is not optimally fast, but it seems good enough, and is
probably nearly as fast as the old protocol anyhow.
emitSerializedOutput for ProgressMeter is not yet implemented. It needs
to somehow start or update a progress meter. There may need to be a new
message that allocates a progress meter, and then have ProgressMeter
update it.
This commit was sponsored by Ethan Aubin
This is done always, it's up to the comsumer to decide if it wants to
output the json objects or the messages.
Messages.JSON.finalize changed to not need a JSONOptions.
As far as I can see, this does not change its behavior,
since addErrorMessage appends to any list that's already there.
This commit was sponsored by Ethan Aubin.
Json objects not yet handled, and some other special cases, but this is
the bulk of the messages.
For progress meters, POSIXTime does not have a Read instance (or a
suitable Show instance), so had to switch to using a Double for progress
meters.
This commit was sponsored by Ethan Aubin on Patreon.
Added annex.adjustedbranchrefresh git config to update adjusted branches
set up by git-annex adjust --unlock-present/--hide-missing.
Note, in a few cases, I was not able to make the adjusted branch
be updated in calls to moveAnnex, because information about what
file corresponds to a key is not available. They are:
* If two files point to one file, then eg, `git annex get foo` will
update the branch to unlock foo, but will not unlock bar, because it
does not know about it. Might be fixable by making `git annex get
bar` do something besides skipping bar?
* git-annex-shell recvkey likewise (so sends over ssh from old versions
of git-annex)
* git-annex setkey
* git-annex transferkey if the user does not use --file
* git-annex multicast sends keys with no associated file info
Doing a single full refresh at the end, after any incremental refresh,
will deal with those edge cases.
An --unlock-present branch reverses back to a branch where
all files that get modified or renamed become locked, even if they were
originally unlocked. This is the same that reversing a --unlock branch
works, and the new name makes that commonality more clear.
Like --hide-missing the branch does not get updated when content
availability changes.
Seems to basically work, but sync does not update it yet.
Also, when a file is present and so unlocked, git mv followed by
git-annex sync results in the basis branch being updated to contain the
file with the new name, unlocked. This seems different than what
happens in an adjusted unlocked branch, where the commit propigates back
locked. Probably the reverse adjustment code needs to be improved to
handle this case.
Lots of nice wins from this in avoiding unncessary work, and I think
nothing got slower.
This commit was sponsored by Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. on Patreon.
nukeFile replaced with removeWhenExistsWith removeLink, which allows
using RawFilePath. Utility.Directory cannot use RawFilePath since setup
does not depend on posix.
This commit was sponsored by Graham Spencer on Patreon.
The latter is for git-annex matchexpression and matching against it can
throw an exception. Splitting out the former reduces the potential for
mistakes and avoids needing to worry about matching against that
throwing an exception.
This is more groundwork for matching largefiles while importing,
without downloading content.
This commit was sponsored by Graham Spencer on Patreon.
Anything that needs to examine the file content will fail to match,
or fall back to other available information. But the intent is that the
matcher be checked for matchNeedsFileContent and only be used if it does
not, so the exact behavior doesn't much matter as it should never
happen.
The real point of this is to not need to provide a dummy content file
when matching.
This commit was sponsored by Martin D on Patreon.
Sped up seeking for files to operate on, when using options like --copies
or --in, by around 20%.
Benchmark showed an increase for --copies from 155 seconds to 121
seconds, and --in remote will be similar to that.
For --in here, the speedup was less, 5-10% or so.
(both warm cache)
This commit was sponsored by Jack Hill on Patreon.
Sped up seeking to around twice as fast, by avoiding a pass over the
worktree files when preferred content expressions of the local repo and
remotes don't use include=/exclude=.
Thanks to Lukey for identifying the optimisation.
This commit was sponsored by Brock Spratlen on Patreon.
matchNeedsFileContent is not used yet, but shows how to add information
about terminals. That one would be needed for
https://git-annex.branchable.com/todo/sync_fast_import/
Note the tricky bit in Annex.FileMatcher.call where it folds over the
included matcher to propagate the information.
This commit was sponsored by Svenne Krap on Patreon.
The use case of this field is mostly to support -J combined with --json.
When that is implemented, a user will be able to look at the field to
determine which of the requests they have sent it corresponds to.
The field typically has a single value in its list, but in some cases
mutliple values (eg 2 command-line params) are combined together and the
list will have more.
Note that json parsing was already non-strict, so old git-annex metadata
--json --batch can be fed json produced by the new git-annex and will
not stumble over the new field.
No behavior changes (hopefully), just adding SeekInput and plumbing it
through to the JSON display code for later use.
Over the course of 2 grueling days.
withFilesNotInGit reimplemented in terms of seekHelper
should be the only possible behavior change. It seems to test as
behaving the same.
Note that seekHelper dummies up the SeekInput in the case where
segmentPaths' gives up on sorting the expanded paths because there are
too many input paths. When SeekInput later gets exposed as a json field,
that will result in it being a little bit wrong in the case where
100 or more paths are passed to a git-annex command. I think this is a
subtle enough problem to not matter. If it does turn out to be a
problem, fixing it would require splitting up the input
parameters into groups of < 100, which would make git ls-files run
perhaps more than is necessary. May want to revisit this, because that
fix seems fairly low-impact.
Potentially fixes https://git-annex.branchable.com/bugs/concurrent_git-annex-copy_to_s3_special_remote_fails/
although I don't know if it does.
My thinking is, ResourceT may allocate a resource and then free it,
and a unforced thunk to that resource could result in reading memory
that has since been overwritten by something else, or in a SEGV,
depending. While that seems kind of like a bug in ResourceT to me, if it
is what's happening, this will avoid it. If it's not, this doesn't
really hurt much since the values are all smallish.
This commit was sponsored by Graham Spencer on Patreon.
Works better with automatic merge conflict resolution than git's ususual
default of "conflict".
This is not done when automatic merge conflict resolution is disabled.
This commit was sponsored by Mark Reidenbach on Patreon.
One reason is, 5 is an arbitrary number so ought to be configurable.
The real reason though, is I wanted to make the man page explain when
forward retry can override annex.retry, and having a config made the
man page easier to write.
This is groundwork for external backends, but also makes sense to keep
this information with the rest of a Backend's implementation.
Also, removed isVerifiable. I noticed that the same information is
encoded by whether a Backend implements verifyKeyContent or not.
My worry was that a preferred content expression that matches on metadata
would have removed the location log from cache, causing an expensive
re-read when a Seek action later checked the location log.
Especially when the --all optimisation in the previous commit
pre-cached the location log.
This also means that the --all optimisation could cache the metadata log
too, if it wanted too, but not currently done.
The cache is a list, with the most recently accessed file first. That
optimises it for the common case of reading the same file twice, eg a
get, examine, followed by set reads it twice. And sync --content reads the
location log 3 times in a row commonly.
But, as a list, it should not be made to be too long. I thought about
expanding it to 5 items, but that seemed unlikely to be a win commonly
enough to outweigh the extra time spent checking the cache.
Clearly there could be some further benchmarking and tuning here.
The cache was removed way back in 2012,
commit 3417c55189
Then I forgot I had removed it! I remember clearly multiple times when I
thought, "this reads the same data twice, but the cache will avoid that
being very expensive".
The reason it was removed was it messed up the assistant noticing when
other processes made changes. That same kind of problem has recently
been addressed when adding the optimisation to avoid reading the journal
unnecessarily.
Indeed, enableInteractiveJournalAccess is run in just the
right places, so can just piggyback on it to know when it's not safe
to use the cache.
Only supported by some special remotes: directory
I need to check the rest and they're currently missing methods until I do.
git-annex sync --no-content does not yet use this to do imports
git is making that configurable, and configuring it globally would break
the test suite in a few places.
No other part of git-annex assumes any branch name. Renamed a few
placeholders to make that clearer.
This commit was sponsored by Jake Vosloo on Patreon.
This makes the creds get saved, since only things recorded there will be
saved.
IIRC, unparsedRemoteConfig was not originally available when I
implemented this; now that it is things get a bit simpler.
More could probably be simplified, is externalConfigChanges needed at
all?
This does not entirely fix the bugs though, because creds are only
embedded when embedcreds=yes, but not when encryption=pubkey is used
without embedcreds=yes.
Added annex.skipunknown git config, that can be set to false to change the
behavior of commands like `git annex get foo*`, to not skip over files/dirs
that are not checked into git and are explicitly listed in the command
line.
Significant complexity was needed to handle git-annex add, which uses some
git ls-files calls, but needs to not use --error-unmatch because of course
the files are not known to git.
annex.skipunknown is planned to change to default to false in a
git-annex release in early 2022. There's a todo for that.
move --to, copy --to, mirror --to: When concurrency is enabled, run cleanup
actions in separate job pool from uploads.
transferStages was confusingly named, it's only useful when doing downloads
as then the verify actions can be run concurrently with other downloads.
For commands that upload, there will be more concurrency from running
cleanup actions in a separate job pool.
As for sync, I left it using downloadStages although that's not optimal
for the part of a sync that uploads. Perhaps it should use the union of
both?
