From ff4486b91cdd494d9b49fa6d0b4a15eb86163a5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 12:45:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comments --- ...10_d2242b526c7cce1084bbb63ef2bfe06a._comment | 8 ++++++++ ..._9_49cda6f52fa4fb527b392f6ee6bae078._comment | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/merge-annex-branches__61__false_-_automate_and_extend/comment_10_d2242b526c7cce1084bbb63ef2bfe06a._comment create mode 100644 doc/bugs/merge-annex-branches__61__false_-_automate_and_extend/comment_9_49cda6f52fa4fb527b392f6ee6bae078._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/merge-annex-branches__61__false_-_automate_and_extend/comment_10_d2242b526c7cce1084bbb63ef2bfe06a._comment b/doc/bugs/merge-annex-branches__61__false_-_automate_and_extend/comment_10_d2242b526c7cce1084bbb63ef2bfe06a._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..2ff530eb74 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/merge-annex-branches__61__false_-_automate_and_extend/comment_10_d2242b526c7cce1084bbb63ef2bfe06a._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 10""" + date="2021-12-30T16:43:10Z" + content=""" +@yoh I'm also planning to extend git-annex's test suite with checks that +some of the basic queries work in readonly repos. +"""]] diff --git a/doc/bugs/merge-annex-branches__61__false_-_automate_and_extend/comment_9_49cda6f52fa4fb527b392f6ee6bae078._comment b/doc/bugs/merge-annex-branches__61__false_-_automate_and_extend/comment_9_49cda6f52fa4fb527b392f6ee6bae078._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9b6c23c4ab --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/merge-annex-branches__61__false_-_automate_and_extend/comment_9_49cda6f52fa4fb527b392f6ee6bae078._comment @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 9""" + date="2021-12-30T16:34:03Z" + content=""" +@jkniiv that may somehow be windows-specific, if opening a sqlite database +on windows in order to only query it needs write access. + +I did try this on linux with an unlocked file and it did not crash, but the +file was already present in the database. I also tried with the keysdb +deleted, and it still worked. I'm sure that there are situations though +where the database is not updated where it will try to populate it before +querying it, which will fail when it cannot write. + +It would be worth filing new bug reports for such issues. Although +when write access is unavoidable, I might just have to close them. +"""]]