From f7efba00fd7a23698c062afddd1ef8c1bd095985 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://mildred.fr/" Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 14:05:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: submodules with git-annex in direct mode --- ...omment_2_26f6581b5969eb2cb77495c40de88951._comment | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Problems_using_submodules_with_git-annex__63__/comment_2_26f6581b5969eb2cb77495c40de88951._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Problems_using_submodules_with_git-annex__63__/comment_2_26f6581b5969eb2cb77495c40de88951._comment b/doc/forum/Problems_using_submodules_with_git-annex__63__/comment_2_26f6581b5969eb2cb77495c40de88951._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a9e9398341 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Problems_using_submodules_with_git-annex__63__/comment_2_26f6581b5969eb2cb77495c40de88951._comment @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://mildred.fr/" + nickname="Mildred" + subject="submodules with git-annex in direct mode" + date="2014-04-27T14:05:20Z" + content=""" +Does this work well even with direct mode ? +How is this managed in direct mode ? + +Coming back from direct mode to indirect mode (required when I want to run git commands) I found that the .gitmodules file was an annex symlink (to .git/annex/objects/...). I just recovered from corrupt repository and may have made mistakes, but is this a risk under normal curcumstances ? +"""]]