From f6fc066ddbdc4d11e817313e3be8cbab779a7532 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zardoz Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 19:34:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_2_cc0f5be21fd1523bdddc7bcf6ff04435._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Performance_implications_of_triply_nested_objects_directory/comment_2_cc0f5be21fd1523bdddc7bcf6ff04435._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Performance_implications_of_triply_nested_objects_directory/comment_2_cc0f5be21fd1523bdddc7bcf6ff04435._comment b/doc/forum/Performance_implications_of_triply_nested_objects_directory/comment_2_cc0f5be21fd1523bdddc7bcf6ff04435._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e47565d676 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Performance_implications_of_triply_nested_objects_directory/comment_2_cc0f5be21fd1523bdddc7bcf6ff04435._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="zardoz" + ip="78.49.247.112" + subject="comment 2" + date="2014-07-14T19:34:31Z" + content=""" +I suppose you misread something. Note that the 60s traversal was on the (slower) /external/ drive, and the 24minute traversal on the (faster) internal one, so if anything, the results become more pronounced because of the comparison. + +In the meantime I converted the internal drive to btrfs, and the traversal time on SATA is now 30s, as opposed to the >20min on ext. +"""]]