fix
This commit is contained in:
parent
ebfa50b729
commit
f664a2538a
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ hash subdirectories in Tahoe is expensive. Instead it would be good to use
|
|||
it as a key/value store directly. The catch is that doing so involves
|
||||
sending the content to Tahoe, and getting back a key identifier.
|
||||
|
||||
This would be fairly easy to do as a [[backend]], which can assign its
|
||||
This would be fairly easy to do as a [[backend|backends]], which can assign its
|
||||
own key names (although typically done before data is stored in it),
|
||||
but a tahoe-lafs special remote would be more flexible.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue