From f381b5f9529a28c5f5061f434baff137efb15203 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "wsha.code+ga@b38779424f41c5701bbe5937340be43ff1474b2d" Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:56:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_8_e9597062bbc530920343e5159a7b7ea1._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Future_proofing___47___disaster_recovery_with_an_encrypted_special_remote/comment_8_e9597062bbc530920343e5159a7b7ea1._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Future_proofing___47___disaster_recovery_with_an_encrypted_special_remote/comment_8_e9597062bbc530920343e5159a7b7ea1._comment b/doc/forum/Future_proofing___47___disaster_recovery_with_an_encrypted_special_remote/comment_8_e9597062bbc530920343e5159a7b7ea1._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..921d75e1c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Future_proofing___47___disaster_recovery_with_an_encrypted_special_remote/comment_8_e9597062bbc530920343e5159a7b7ea1._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="wsha.code+ga@b38779424f41c5701bbe5937340be43ff1474b2d" + nickname="wsha.code+ga" + subject="comment 8" + date="2016-01-08T06:56:02Z" + content=""" +Thanks for spending the time to check the script. It would have taken me quite a while to catch that issue. I was also a little bit surprised that the hybrid encryption mode uses the base64 encoded cipher string while the shared encryption mode uses the cipher after decoding from base64. + +I can now reproduce the HMAC'ed keys and decrypt the files all the supported forms of encryption using openssl and gpg which makes me feel comfortable using them for long term storage. +"""]]