From f37c2c6a73d1b7f098b998723edecf8d3449dd39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:25:55 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] indents --- .../concurrent_drop--from_presence_checking_failures.mdwn | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/bugs/concurrent_drop--from_presence_checking_failures.mdwn b/doc/bugs/concurrent_drop--from_presence_checking_failures.mdwn index f3517c29a2..93e9b931aa 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/concurrent_drop--from_presence_checking_failures.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/concurrent_drop--from_presence_checking_failures.mdwn @@ -28,9 +28,9 @@ consider, for example: A wants from drop from A B wants to drop from B A locks it A checks if B has it (succeeds) -A drops it from A B locks it +A drops it from A B locks it B checks if A has it (fails) - B fails to drop it + B fails to drop it Which is also ok. @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ A locks it A checks if B has it (succeeds) B locks it B checks if A has it - (does, but locked, so fails) + (does, but locked, so fails) A drops it B fails to drop it Yay, still ok.