From f19ee2c479fabea39a784f90b5bfbdda35d364af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 12:21:33 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] thought --- .../better_manggling_of_filenames_in_views_via_unicode.mdwn | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/better_manggling_of_filenames_in_views_via_unicode.mdwn b/doc/todo/better_manggling_of_filenames_in_views_via_unicode.mdwn index a0d08914b4..b21c4c6264 100644 --- a/doc/todo/better_manggling_of_filenames_in_views_via_unicode.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/better_manggling_of_filenames_in_views_via_unicode.mdwn @@ -18,3 +18,9 @@ the old names when unmangeling (in dirFromViewedFile). Perhaps something additional could be recorded when entering a view branch that indicates what kind of name mangling was used, so it doesn't have to try both. --[[Joey]] + +> When several files are in a deep directory tree like `foo/bar/baz`, +> that would be an annoying common prefix to deal with, which the current +> mangling avoids. So perhaps keeping it postfix is still a good idea, but +> it could still use the psdudoslash. Eg, `somefile@foo/bar/baz.ext`? +> --[[Joey]]