From ef82fab4bb9a518100a957deea2846ce86353eb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: anarcat Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:53:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: thanks --- ...omment_3_2c895e4494cddab70ba761c6c48e7cf8._comment | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/optimising_lookupkey/comment_3_2c895e4494cddab70ba761c6c48e7cf8._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/optimising_lookupkey/comment_3_2c895e4494cddab70ba761c6c48e7cf8._comment b/doc/forum/optimising_lookupkey/comment_3_2c895e4494cddab70ba761c6c48e7cf8._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5ee6599586 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/optimising_lookupkey/comment_3_2c895e4494cddab70ba761c6c48e7cf8._comment @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="anarcat" + subject="thanks" + date="2015-02-18T21:53:52Z" + content=""" +great, thanks for the feedback! + +i agree that 25ms is quite fast to fire up a 52MB binary. :) i am just saying that if this is going to end up as part of building a webpage, i need something faster, or cache the results somewhere. + +duly noted for the other points, thanks again. i see a great intimate relationship building between `git cat-file` and me. ;) +"""]]