mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment: Settable default preferred content?

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
adehnert 2024-09-24 00:02:21 +00:00 committed by admin
parent edc02432ef
commit ec59cb526f
1 changed files with 12 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
doc/preferred_content/comment_12_34558cad8f7e5c1db8b0bef8bc7656c3._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="adehnert"
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/a4fc9cc6278919b6f40df8e3cc84355b"
subject="Settable default preferred content?"
date="2024-09-24T00:02:20Z"
content="""
Is there any way to set a default preferred content setting -- either used when a new clone is made or whenever a repo doesn't specify one?
I've got an annex that has a couple servers with all the content, and several clients[1] -- which I create more often and more manually -- that just want the content I pick. Basically every time I set up another client, I run `git annex sync --content`, am surprised to see a bunch of `get ...` lines, go kill the sync, set group and preferred content to be manual/standard, and run the sync again. It'd be handy if I could set up the repo in advance to just configure that by default. (I guess I could make an alias that does like `git clone $server/$repo && cd $repo && git annex wanted . standard && git annex group . manual`, but it'd be nice if I could just do the `git clone` I'm used to and it would all work.)
[1] AIUI, the \"client\" group means \"get every file referenced in HEAD, unless it's in archive/, and skip older versions\"? I guess that makes sense for like a software project with some media assets. I've mostly used git-annex for situations where most files aren't being actively worked with and clients only have a few of them, which is where it seems to really shine over GitLFS. I've always been vaguely surprised by how the client group works as a result. Any sense of how commonly people use it for different use cases? It is *excellent* for the sparse checkout case though.
"""]]