mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment: TL;DR

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
amerlyq 2022-04-02 14:13:48 +00:00 committed by admin
parent 93e056b8bc
commit eb4e20c80b
1 changed files with 23 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

23
doc/bugs/adb_pull_does_not_preserve_timestamp/comment_7_216316d2db3a728837fd059587ad1928._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="amerlyq"
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/3d63c9f436b45570d45bd003e468cbd3"
subject="TL;DR"
date="2022-04-02T14:13:48Z"
content="""
@joey can we change android remote to use \"pull -a\" at least \"for now\"?
Let's try doing it in Linux Kernel or ZeroMQ way: enable/disable feature and wait for new bugreports.
And if new bugreports were critical -- revert feature back.
After all we can't predict everything from the get go.
I wish to preserve file original mtime (date of download) at least \"somewhere\" (e.g. manually dump find/CID into textual file).
But doing \"annex pull\" from android remote loses this information completely.
And this feature is critical for me -- unless some evidence will appear that having this feature more detrimental than not.
Concerns about SUID and other permissions are ungrounded,
because Android virtual driver for /sdcard uses only 644/755 by design.
But instead of speculating -- we may simply wait for new bugreports.
@joey, what do you say?
Let's experiment and gather results from wider audience?
"""]]