From 4953fafd6829147c17c71feef5f935503a552033 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:41:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_6_d3c9a1bee717b5b99f31be81150a3ec8._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Possible_data-loss_if_WORM_keys_do_not_encode_relative_paths/comment_6_d3c9a1bee717b5b99f31be81150a3ec8._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Possible_data-loss_if_WORM_keys_do_not_encode_relative_paths/comment_6_d3c9a1bee717b5b99f31be81150a3ec8._comment b/doc/bugs/Possible_data-loss_if_WORM_keys_do_not_encode_relative_paths/comment_6_d3c9a1bee717b5b99f31be81150a3ec8._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d22ef3e0ac --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Possible_data-loss_if_WORM_keys_do_not_encode_relative_paths/comment_6_d3c9a1bee717b5b99f31be81150a3ec8._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="209.250.56.132" + subject="comment 6" + date="2014-09-11T18:41:45Z" + content=""" +Ok, those are good examples. I personally think it would be insane to use WORM in a repository in either of those cases, or really in almost any case where you do not have a strong degree of confidence that unique file contents have unique file names. If people are going to abuse WORM like that, it might be best to simply remove it. (Except I have quite a lot of WORMy disks.) + +I suppose I'll add the extra data, although I remain unconvinced that it is going to help anyone who should actually be using WORM. +"""]]