From e9696cf6d951f7d1e0734f0a256ad8c416cc6bc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:17:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_3_65910eeaf3c6fcfd03f22c2957293232._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/reserving_space_with_directory_special_remotes/comment_3_65910eeaf3c6fcfd03f22c2957293232._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/reserving_space_with_directory_special_remotes/comment_3_65910eeaf3c6fcfd03f22c2957293232._comment b/doc/forum/reserving_space_with_directory_special_remotes/comment_3_65910eeaf3c6fcfd03f22c2957293232._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..245849c5f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/reserving_space_with_directory_special_remotes/comment_3_65910eeaf3c6fcfd03f22c2957293232._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="4.154.7.235" + subject="comment 3" + date="2013-07-11T16:17:36Z" + content=""" +Shows what I know! It is supported. Repurposed the bug report to allow configuring a different diskreserve for the remote than the main annex.diskreserve.. +"""]]