Added a comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
29f6b19525
commit
e832676d38
1 changed files with 12 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="Dan"
|
||||||
|
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/986de9e060699ae70ff7c31342393adc"
|
||||||
|
subject="comment 14"
|
||||||
|
date="2022-07-29T22:02:56Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
Ah, I hadn't considered the parallel to the standard `find` command, but now that you mention that I understand where you're coming from and can appreciate why `whereis` is free of this association.
|
||||||
|
Still, I would think that a user who, after looking at the docs for `git annex find`, specified `--all` because they wanted to operate on keys would not be surprised.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I notice that the man page for `git annex find` already has a \"SEE ALSO\" reference to `git annex whereis`.
|
||||||
|
Could this be expanded so that it more clearly and prominently advises the reader who is looking to query against all known keys to check out the `--all` argument to `git annex whereis` as well as its `--format=` option if \"whereis\" information is not actually of interest?
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue