From e7fc0b1af1ea1c3b7f5aaf5f6a042e7a30e45a31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "80d8aa@c71d4a9510ad0353dbcf7df399c2e6bde0012474" <80d8aa@web>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 17:07:39 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: Use existing ssh keys

---
 ...mment_4_8977bb8ee662c30dfcecae73cede9dfa._comment | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/forum/use_existing_ssh_keys__63__/comment_4_8977bb8ee662c30dfcecae73cede9dfa._comment

diff --git a/doc/forum/use_existing_ssh_keys__63__/comment_4_8977bb8ee662c30dfcecae73cede9dfa._comment b/doc/forum/use_existing_ssh_keys__63__/comment_4_8977bb8ee662c30dfcecae73cede9dfa._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..696120da9c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/use_existing_ssh_keys__63__/comment_4_8977bb8ee662c30dfcecae73cede9dfa._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="80d8aa@c71d4a9510ad0353dbcf7df399c2e6bde0012474"
+ nickname="80d8aa"
+ avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/b3f9ee295805d0758d569ca97157fb65"
+ subject="Use existing ssh keys"
+ date="2017-09-30T17:07:39Z"
+ content="""
+Is there an argument against the original request of being able to use an existing *non-default* ssh key when setting up a remote ssh repo with the webapp?
+
+As suggested above, one could reasonably have different identities, not all of which should have access to the git-annex repo. AFAIU, the way things are one has to either use their default identity with a remote ssh repo OR temporarily enable password authentication on the server so that the webapp will generate and install its own key, then turn it off. That is a tall order and might not even be possible if the server is not under the user's control. Am I missing something?
+
+"""]]