From e42ac8844e9b3eec570fa7254ceeb5c64ee81eab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yarikoptic Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 21:43:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_3_05a8fbcf2b069c561b6e24286565af5f._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/copy_with_both_--to_and_--from_/comment_3_05a8fbcf2b069c561b6e24286565af5f._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/copy_with_both_--to_and_--from_/comment_3_05a8fbcf2b069c561b6e24286565af5f._comment b/doc/todo/copy_with_both_--to_and_--from_/comment_3_05a8fbcf2b069c561b6e24286565af5f._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c4af4438b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/copy_with_both_--to_and_--from_/comment_3_05a8fbcf2b069c561b6e24286565af5f._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="yarikoptic" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f11e9c84cb18d26a1748c33b48c924b4" + subject="comment 3" + date="2023-01-16T21:43:40Z" + content=""" +FWIW -- alternating is fine, all my files should be able to fit on the drive individually (but not all at once) while doing some number of them in parallel. **BUT** in some use cases (e.g. AWS) - drive IO could be slower than network IO (it was the use case which inspired me to complain to get checksumming done inbound with downloading). So, if stored locally, it has potential to become much slower. But I am not sure if that would be feasible anyhow to establish generic pipe-ing between various remotes. +"""]]