Added a comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
3d065ff4aa
commit
e1ed7c933a
1 changed files with 12 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkexhIpGcYa22aPQtLm-StpHiF-MHYPh5w"
|
||||||
|
nickname="Robie"
|
||||||
|
subject="comment 6"
|
||||||
|
date="2013-06-10T17:24:34Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
This seems reasonable to me.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
One other possibility that you could end up with a duplicate: if `glacier-cli`'s cache is not up to date. For example: hosts A and B both have (the same) annex with the same Glacier special remote defined. Host A copies a file to Glacier. On host B, the `glacier-cli` cache doesn't know about the file, and so a copy to Glacier on host B also succeeds. When the cache is later brought up to date `glacier vault sync`, then the duplicate appears.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I'm not sure what we can do about this. Perhaps we need to accept that duplicates will occur, and handle them more gracefully.
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue