mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment: Could I get a "version", brethren?

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
http://joeyh.name/ 2014-02-20 17:58:32 +00:00 committed by admin
parent fe5f7b9a48
commit e1c71981fe
1 changed files with 12 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
doc/bugs/copy_unused_and_unused_not_agreeing/comment_2_15559ba19393f5c061f77bc56379f8e1._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joeyh.name/"
ip="209.250.56.172"
subject="Could I get a "version", brethren?"
date="2014-02-20T17:58:32Z"
content="""
I think there are two bugs here. I just reproduced and fixed a bug that would caused `git annex unused` to sometimes not notice certain unused keys when in direct mode. That's why the number you were finding in direct and indirect was different.
That does not explain why `copy --unused` would not operate on unused files when in direct mode. A problem I have not managed to reproduce..
There was a recent change to the format of the .git/annex/unused.log, which temporarily broke reading it (fixed in 5.20140210). This could be some version skew problem, as while the new git-annex version can read the old log format, the old git-annex version will ignore the new log format.
"""]]