This commit is contained in:
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmTNrhkVQ26GBLaLD5-zNuEiR8syTj4mI8 2013-08-23 16:54:07 +00:00 committed by admin
parent 05d997a2c4
commit e159404b8b

View file

@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ What it seems to be doing is moving away all content in set1, and copying it bac
I think I should have independently added both datasets, let them be scanned and then connect to each other. I think I should have independently added both datasets, let them be scanned and then connect to each other.
So, now the questions: So, now the questions:
1. Is that the correct way to proceed? 1. Is that the correct way to proceed?
2. What if I have to identical files with different modifying times, I hope they are not synced, right? 2. What if I have to identical files with different modifying times, I hope they are not synced, right?
3. Is it posssible to achieve this behaviour of copying only the 50Mb? 3. Is it posssible to achieve this behaviour of copying only the 50Mb?
@ -19,5 +20,6 @@ Best regards,
Juan Juan
EDIT: a couple of questions more: EDIT: a couple of questions more:
4. after finishing, set2 ended with a lot of symlinks but only in one subfolder. To prevent this should I put numcopies in 2? 4. after finishing, set2 ended with a lot of symlinks but only in one subfolder. To prevent this should I put numcopies in 2?
5. This data is composed of input datasets and output simulations. Thus, I need to change them often, but not as often as code and in a very partial way (chunks of 50Mb). For me direct mode is the best (or plain git). However, I was wondering, it is possible to drop some files (even in direct mode) and use simlinks instead? 5. This data is composed of input datasets and output simulations. Thus, I need to change them often, but not as often as code and in a very partial way (chunks of 50Mb). For me direct mode is the best (or plain git). However, I was wondering, it is possible to drop some files (even in direct mode) and use simlinks instead?