mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

update

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2016-09-08 12:18:58 -04:00
parent 673065ea05
commit dff511a2fe
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: C910D9222512E3C7
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
doc/todo/interface_to_the___34__progress__34___of_annex_operations/comment_1_b71937cb772b3400839755bb11a1ffe4._comment
View file

@ -62,4 +62,14 @@ That's not a lot more verbose than the earlier version, and it ensures that
consumers of the progress objects have all possible information available consumers of the progress objects have all possible information available
(including the name of the remote being downloaded from in the above (including the name of the remote being downloaded from in the above
example). example).
Less verbose version:
{"progress-id":"1","action":{"command":"get","key":"SHA256E-s5242880--82cb4363f596cb66e7bc6e4cbfd2bfe8a8b6ac7e6d02557cc0e3944ec8faafc3","file":"bar","note":"from d1..."}}
{"progress-id":"1","percent-progress":"25%","byte-progress":500}
{"progress-id":"1","percent-progress":"75%","byte-progress":1500}
{"command":"get","key":"SHA256E-s5242880--82cb4363f596cb66e7bc6e4cbfd2bfe8a8b6ac7e6d02557cc0e3944ec8faafc3","file":"bar","note":"from d1...","success":true}
Makes the consumer's job a bit more complicated, and could also make the
implementation in git-annex harder. Is it worth it?
"""]] """]]