Added a comment: use named pipes?
This commit is contained in:
parent
70172712a5
commit
dd58cfd8e1
1 changed files with 11 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="Ilya_Shlyakhter"
|
||||
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/1647044369aa7747829c38b9dcc84df0"
|
||||
subject="use named pipes?"
|
||||
date="2019-11-25T16:45:26Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
For external remotes can pass to the `TRANSFER` request, as the `FILE` parameter, a named pipe, and use `tee` to create a separate stream for checksumming.
|
||||
|
||||
An external remote could also do its own checksum checking and then set remote.<name>.annex-verify=false.
|
||||
Could also make a “wrapper” external remote that delegates all requests to a given external remote but does checksum-checking in parallel with downloading (by creating a named pipe and passing that to the wrapped remote).
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue