no
This commit is contained in:
parent
c93824d7f4
commit
db9dbc3161
1 changed files with 21 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="joey"
|
||||||
|
subject="""comment 1"""
|
||||||
|
date="2020-02-20T21:33:35Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
No, there are not.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I'd like to turn this question around. You, and others, seem to have low
|
||||||
|
expectations of git-annex's locking and handling of concurrency. Is there a
|
||||||
|
change to the documentation somewhere that would convey that git-annex
|
||||||
|
handles multiple concurrent operations, without stepping on each other's
|
||||||
|
toes, with extensive fine-grained locking at both the thread and file level?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Because I keep anwering what seems like the same question, over and over.
|
||||||
|
And I don't understand why people seem to expect the worst, it's kind of a
|
||||||
|
downer and it's tedious to keep having to reassure people. Is it
|
||||||
|
something I did? Is it a general expectation that concurrency is hard and
|
||||||
|
so everything will get it wrong? Is it specifically git certianly having
|
||||||
|
poor locking in several places notably around the index and assuming that
|
||||||
|
git-annex will inherit it?
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue