diff --git a/doc/bugs/git-annex_confuses_Git_with_nested_submodules.mdwn b/doc/bugs/git-annex_confuses_Git_with_nested_submodules.mdwn
index 83d74f79f6..7bc6d74439 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/git-annex_confuses_Git_with_nested_submodules.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/git-annex_confuses_Git_with_nested_submodules.mdwn
@@ -35,3 +35,4 @@ More recently I aim exploring the use of git annex for managing datasets and the
 BTW: What a nice idea to ask for something like this in a bug report.
 
 
+[[!meta author=mih]]
diff --git a/doc/bugs/git-annex_confuses_Git_with_nested_submodules/comment_5_c35478d4fbe6dde21d22369494414fe8._comment b/doc/bugs/git-annex_confuses_Git_with_nested_submodules/comment_5_c35478d4fbe6dde21d22369494414fe8._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..47cf7624dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/git-annex_confuses_Git_with_nested_submodules/comment_5_c35478d4fbe6dde21d22369494414fe8._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://me.yahoo.com/a/EbvxpTI_xP9Aod7Mg4cwGhgjrCrdM5s-#7c0f4"
+ subject="comment 5"
+ date="2016-04-19T14:47:58Z"
+ content="""
+Hi Joey,  since git people agreed that it was a regression, should we expect this issue to be fixed on their side?  Could you please follow up since discussion on the mailing list you have referenced has ended without closure
+"""]]