From da6d69f6914aaaa521ff06e0f3d6c2126b9703c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:31:37 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] response --- ...ent_2_e277962791b64e67b08ccff47dd22447._comment | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/git-annex-checkpresentkey/comment_2_e277962791b64e67b08ccff47dd22447._comment diff --git a/doc/git-annex-checkpresentkey/comment_2_e277962791b64e67b08ccff47dd22447._comment b/doc/git-annex-checkpresentkey/comment_2_e277962791b64e67b08ccff47dd22447._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..38bb1d9e5e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/git-annex-checkpresentkey/comment_2_e277962791b64e67b08ccff47dd22447._comment @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 2""" + date="2018-09-24T15:28:59Z" + content=""" +It makes sense that checkpresentkey could report different information than +whereis, because whereis only reports on logged location information, +while checkpresentkey actively checks the remote. + +I'm not entirely clear on how an external special remote could not support +checkpresent, I suppose you might mean it always fails or is just not +implemented (so basically fails). That would be a problem with the remote's +implementation. If it's something else, open a bug report. +"""]]