From d9c85cff34c7341c75d359bf403a8ff023cfa2fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "http://joeyh.name/" <joey@web>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:48:16 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment

---
 .../comment_1_35acbdd1a7727df204d776c2e8f02b53._comment   | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/forum/Will_git-annex_solve_my_problem__63__/comment_1_35acbdd1a7727df204d776c2e8f02b53._comment

diff --git a/doc/forum/Will_git-annex_solve_my_problem__63__/comment_1_35acbdd1a7727df204d776c2e8f02b53._comment b/doc/forum/Will_git-annex_solve_my_problem__63__/comment_1_35acbdd1a7727df204d776c2e8f02b53._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a4f27f46ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Will_git-annex_solve_my_problem__63__/comment_1_35acbdd1a7727df204d776c2e8f02b53._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ nickname="joey"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2013-03-27T22:48:16Z"
+ content="""
+git-annex will not perform better than rsync. It uses rsync. It also does not yet use old versions of files as a rsync basis when transferring a new version of a file, so is not as efficient in this scenario.
+"""]]