From 386065bf921b1cbb198ab19a15960b9b88884937 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: edward Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:43:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...nt_2_2e878c5ae1892f16f5b4e515fbe8875b._comment | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/unlock_should_warn_if_file_isn__39__t_in_repo/comment_2_2e878c5ae1892f16f5b4e515fbe8875b._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/unlock_should_warn_if_file_isn__39__t_in_repo/comment_2_2e878c5ae1892f16f5b4e515fbe8875b._comment b/doc/bugs/unlock_should_warn_if_file_isn__39__t_in_repo/comment_2_2e878c5ae1892f16f5b4e515fbe8875b._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8f34197b6c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/unlock_should_warn_if_file_isn__39__t_in_repo/comment_2_2e878c5ae1892f16f5b4e515fbe8875b._comment @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="edward" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/1e64ab07e0faced09520a5c589deb70b" + subject="comment 2" + date="2016-11-07T17:43:31Z" + content=""" +I see your point, feel free to close this bug. + +There is a way for git-annex to tell that the file is probably meant to be part of the repo because it is a symlink, it doesn't look the same as a new file. + + ~/scratch/annex/bar (master)$ ls -l + total 4 + lrwxrwxrwx 1 edward edward 181 Nov 4 18:02 test -> ../.git/annex/objects/w8/pv/SHA256E-s5--f2ca1bb6c7e907d06dafe4687e579fce76b37e4e93b7605022da52e6ccc26fd2/SHA256E-s5--f2ca1bb6c7e907d06dafe4687e579fce76b37e4e93b7605022da52e6ccc26fd2 + ~/scratch/annex/bar (master)$ +"""]]