From d6e2f44bee22f59028d23e9916cefaf571f62ba2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "http://joeyh.name/" <joey@web>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:35:15 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment

---
 ...3_301f3ff2d203ac4c58a037e553b2c14d._comment | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/bugs/upgraded_annex__44___suddenly_trying_to_grab_archive_content_onto_client_again/comment_3_301f3ff2d203ac4c58a037e553b2c14d._comment

diff --git a/doc/bugs/upgraded_annex__44___suddenly_trying_to_grab_archive_content_onto_client_again/comment_3_301f3ff2d203ac4c58a037e553b2c14d._comment b/doc/bugs/upgraded_annex__44___suddenly_trying_to_grab_archive_content_onto_client_again/comment_3_301f3ff2d203ac4c58a037e553b2c14d._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f69cef3338
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/upgraded_annex__44___suddenly_trying_to_grab_archive_content_onto_client_again/comment_3_301f3ff2d203ac4c58a037e553b2c14d._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ nickname="joey"
+ subject="comment 3"
+ date="2013-04-27T19:35:15Z"
+ content="""
+Are either the USB drive or the ssh remote configured to be in the archive or smallarchive group?
+
+If not, there was a recent change to how archive directories are handled, which would explain this behavior:
+
+<pre>
+  * Adjust preferred content expressions so that content in archive
+    directories is preferred until it has reached an archive or smallarchive
+    repository.
+</pre>
+
+The solution would be to make the USB drive be in the archive group, probably..
+"""]]