From d35c11de7a83e135636749deb563de2ef3fee3a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joey.kitenet.net/" Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 05:16:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_1_4181bf34c71e2e8845e6e5fb55d53381._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/migrate_existing_git_repository_to_git-annex/comment_1_4181bf34c71e2e8845e6e5fb55d53381._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/migrate_existing_git_repository_to_git-annex/comment_1_4181bf34c71e2e8845e6e5fb55d53381._comment b/doc/forum/migrate_existing_git_repository_to_git-annex/comment_1_4181bf34c71e2e8845e6e5fb55d53381._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e88794d621 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/migrate_existing_git_repository_to_git-annex/comment_1_4181bf34c71e2e8845e6e5fb55d53381._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joey.kitenet.net/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 1" + date="2011-02-25T05:16:48Z" + content=""" +I don't know how to approach this yet, but I support the idea -- it would be great if there was a tool that could punch files out of git history and put them in the annex. (Of course with typical git history rewriting caveats.) + +Sounds like it might be enough to add a switch to git-annex that overrides where it considers the top of the git repository to be? +"""]]