use disconnected history for import tracking branch
This avoids the first merge from it deleting all files in the current branch, which was very surpring and unwanted behavior.
This commit is contained in:
parent
740f957cef
commit
d28b0a8bd0
4 changed files with 27 additions and 33 deletions
|
@ -21,24 +21,6 @@ this.
|
|||
* export needs to use storeExportWithContentIdentifierM for importtree=yes
|
||||
remotes
|
||||
|
||||
* Merging the first import from a remote currently removes all local
|
||||
files that are not present in the remote. But subsequent imports from the
|
||||
remote do not delete newly added local files when merged. This seems
|
||||
inconsistent and very surprising to the user.
|
||||
|
||||
It happens because the remote tracking branch currently starts
|
||||
from the local branch, and then has a commit added to it that contains
|
||||
all files in the remote (and thus deletes the local files).
|
||||
A subsequent import extents the tracking branch by another commit, so
|
||||
merging that does not re-do the deletion.
|
||||
|
||||
One fix would be to start the remote tracking branch not with the local
|
||||
branch. Reflecting it being a perhaps entirely separate line of
|
||||
development. Unless git-annex export were used first, and updated the
|
||||
tracking branch, then the branch would start with what's exported, which
|
||||
is fine. The downside of this is that git merge --allow-unrelated-histories
|
||||
is needed to merge that unrelated history.
|
||||
|
||||
* export needs to update the tracking branch with what it exported
|
||||
|
||||
* "git annex import master --from rmt" followed by "git annex import master:sub --from rmt"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue