Added a comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
542a0018cd
commit
d23a8f1469
1 changed files with 13 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="Atemu"
|
||||
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/d1f0f4275931c552403f4c6707bead7a"
|
||||
subject="comment 5"
|
||||
date="2021-04-08T19:33:44Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
I guess one difference is be that other repos may erroneously think a file is present in the special remote when, in actuality, it has been deleted. (That's what trust/semitrust is for, right?)
|
||||
In my use-case it doesn't make much of a difference since the special remote will rarely see a deletion but I can imagine there might also be ones where it could end catastrophically.
|
||||
|
||||
A better solution all around would probably be to enable the user to override a special remote's perceived locking ability somehow (and only that, no other trust factors).
|
||||
|
||||
Having a runtime switch for temporarily trusting special remotes to lock files would be useful in any case though IMO.
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue