From cedbf88c82da20719ca3fe7a607f91decbce17dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 12:50:25 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] update --- ...t_3_69386f9f7c39782f4809beb5a7b6df92._comment | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Missing_file_content_in_secondary_worktree___40__win__41__/comment_3_69386f9f7c39782f4809beb5a7b6df92._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Missing_file_content_in_secondary_worktree___40__win__41__/comment_3_69386f9f7c39782f4809beb5a7b6df92._comment b/doc/bugs/Missing_file_content_in_secondary_worktree___40__win__41__/comment_3_69386f9f7c39782f4809beb5a7b6df92._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..85e3b7bf95 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Missing_file_content_in_secondary_worktree___40__win__41__/comment_3_69386f9f7c39782f4809beb5a7b6df92._comment @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 3""" + date="2025-07-11T16:42:26Z" + content=""" +I've verified that `populatePointerFile` is not getting called in this case, +and does get called in the same situation on ext4. And that call is made by +`reconcileStaged`, which is getting called. +So I would look in there for the bug. + +Except, interestingly, some percent of the time, on ext4, manually +populating the pointer file followed by git-annex add also does not call +`populatePointerFile`. The pointer file remains unpopulated until another +process calls `reconcileStaged`, and it gets populated then. This seems +like also a bug, possibly another case of the same bug? +"""]]