From cec3ec8a170f6d88a9ddcf92807516ad3c89d052 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:57:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] followup --- ...t_6_54eafe7c4beee93a92a80a544124ce86._comment | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/git_annex_sync_thinks_remote__39__s_name_is_a_command/comment_6_54eafe7c4beee93a92a80a544124ce86._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/git_annex_sync_thinks_remote__39__s_name_is_a_command/comment_6_54eafe7c4beee93a92a80a544124ce86._comment b/doc/bugs/git_annex_sync_thinks_remote__39__s_name_is_a_command/comment_6_54eafe7c4beee93a92a80a544124ce86._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..2af923cbed --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/git_annex_sync_thinks_remote__39__s_name_is_a_command/comment_6_54eafe7c4beee93a92a80a544124ce86._comment @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 6""" + date="2015-03-27T20:56:16Z" + content=""" +"root@192.168.253.53: error while loading shared libraries: +root@192.168.253.53: cannot open shared object file: No such file or +directory" + +That is a different bug entirely. Sure, same codepath, but by posting your +problem report to a closed bug, you muddy the waters considerably. + +I fixed that problem today, once someone else brought it to my attention. +It's a pity that I didn't see your report earlier, due to where you posted +it.. +"""]]