Added a comment: update
This commit is contained in:
parent
6cfd7279a1
commit
cde684e4a8
1 changed files with 11 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlkA6XinbeOdnEDxEGQUWyjqPGh0kdMXr4"
|
||||||
|
nickname="Blake"
|
||||||
|
subject="update"
|
||||||
|
date="2013-10-30T07:19:56Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
It seems both Client-A and Client-B ARE actually syncing with this current setup. I think Client-B was just delayed due to the initial startup scan. So I guess at this point I am more or less asking if having both Client-A and Client-B have the remote repository being a \"full backup\" type is appropriate or if there is a better configuration that achieves what I am hoping to have.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Regards,
|
||||||
|
Blake
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue