From 508aeaeecea406c555820bb8cffc2ad2abd4591e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "http://joeyh.name/" <http://joeyh.name/@web>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:29:46 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Added a comment

---
 .../comment_3_1892bcfbe3c462aa74552a241d65cad9._comment   | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/bugs/__34__drop__34___deletes_all_files_with_identical_content/comment_3_1892bcfbe3c462aa74552a241d65cad9._comment

diff --git a/doc/bugs/__34__drop__34___deletes_all_files_with_identical_content/comment_3_1892bcfbe3c462aa74552a241d65cad9._comment b/doc/bugs/__34__drop__34___deletes_all_files_with_identical_content/comment_3_1892bcfbe3c462aa74552a241d65cad9._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8dfc30a604
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/__34__drop__34___deletes_all_files_with_identical_content/comment_3_1892bcfbe3c462aa74552a241d65cad9._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="2001:4978:f:21a::2"
+ subject="comment 3"
+ date="2012-10-28T23:29:46Z"
+ content="""
+numcopies=0 is inherently unsafe, and unreasonable if you value your data at all. I've added some warnings about it to the man page.
+"""]]

From 0ba27bac7ef0e13788e6eb71e3089096e1a90ad4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:32:25 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] fix example commands in comment

---
 .../comment_1_684b7b652d3a8ec04f32129c5528f1ab._comment   | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/walkthrough/unused_data/comment_1_684b7b652d3a8ec04f32129c5528f1ab._comment b/doc/walkthrough/unused_data/comment_1_684b7b652d3a8ec04f32129c5528f1ab._comment
index cb23247030..2be2a6463f 100644
--- a/doc/walkthrough/unused_data/comment_1_684b7b652d3a8ec04f32129c5528f1ab._comment
+++ b/doc/walkthrough/unused_data/comment_1_684b7b652d3a8ec04f32129c5528f1ab._comment
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
  content="""
 Sometimes links to annexed data still exists on some branch, when it was supposed to be dropped. Here is how I found these; perhaps there is a simpler way.
 
-    % git annex find --format '${key}\n' > /tmp/known-keys
-    % find .git/annex/objects -type f -exec basename {} \; > /tmp/local-keys
+    % git annex find --format '${key}\n' | sort > /tmp/known-keys
+    % find .git/annex/objects -type f -exec basename {} \; | sort  > /tmp/local-keys
     % comm -23 /tmp/local-keys /tmp/known-keys
 
 to look for what branch these are on, try 
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@ to look for what branch these are on, try
 for one of the keys output above. In my case it was the same remote branch keeping them all alive.
 
 
-
-
-
+*EDIT* sort key lists to make comm work properly
 
 """]]

From 861a7932c5fc2fd3e4968437f840c5cd5d95be2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: 
 "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlgyVag95OnpvSzQofjyX0WjW__MOMKsl0"
 <Sehr@web>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:00:34 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Added a comment

---
 ...nt_4_dfa0e31996eaa14e2945c1d11670c4d9._comment | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/bugs/__34__drop__34___deletes_all_files_with_identical_content/comment_4_dfa0e31996eaa14e2945c1d11670c4d9._comment

diff --git a/doc/bugs/__34__drop__34___deletes_all_files_with_identical_content/comment_4_dfa0e31996eaa14e2945c1d11670c4d9._comment b/doc/bugs/__34__drop__34___deletes_all_files_with_identical_content/comment_4_dfa0e31996eaa14e2945c1d11670c4d9._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d82a3026d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/__34__drop__34___deletes_all_files_with_identical_content/comment_4_dfa0e31996eaa14e2945c1d11670c4d9._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlgyVag95OnpvSzQofjyX0WjW__MOMKsl0"
+ nickname="Sehr"
+ subject="comment 4"
+ date="2012-10-29T00:00:33Z"
+ content="""
+Thanks, that's cool. Admittedly, I cannot think of too many scenarios, where there are two identical files without the user's knowloedge. And an even smaller subset of scenarios, where one would want to issue a \"drop\" on (only) one of these due to storage shortages. 
+
+
+
+By the way, I LOVE git-annex.
+
+
+PS: I just realized, that the same applies to the \"move\" command.
+"""]]

From 288c4fb2164048a29064c2936587d73a4d3550bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "http://joeyh.name/" <http://joeyh.name/@web>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:03:40 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Added a comment

---
 .../comment_5_e2a9336cf1080c158765d4adfe72f26b._comment  | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/bugs/__34__drop__34___deletes_all_files_with_identical_content/comment_5_e2a9336cf1080c158765d4adfe72f26b._comment

diff --git a/doc/bugs/__34__drop__34___deletes_all_files_with_identical_content/comment_5_e2a9336cf1080c158765d4adfe72f26b._comment b/doc/bugs/__34__drop__34___deletes_all_files_with_identical_content/comment_5_e2a9336cf1080c158765d4adfe72f26b._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..cc93b0f49f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/__34__drop__34___deletes_all_files_with_identical_content/comment_5_e2a9336cf1080c158765d4adfe72f26b._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="2001:4978:f:21a::2"
+ subject="comment 5"
+ date="2012-10-29T00:03:40Z"
+ content="""
+You're guaranteed to still have at least 1 copy of the file after move though, so you can get it back.
+
+"""]]