From c83a783f45b31d7242d65542813a98e19542951d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mih Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 09:17:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: Status of the import/export protocol implementation --- .../comment_1_9bcf18e2bbe04bf5321e4fc33cca577c._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/export_and_import_appendix/comment_1_9bcf18e2bbe04bf5321e4fc33cca577c._comment diff --git a/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/export_and_import_appendix/comment_1_9bcf18e2bbe04bf5321e4fc33cca577c._comment b/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/export_and_import_appendix/comment_1_9bcf18e2bbe04bf5321e4fc33cca577c._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e84e4e6ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/export_and_import_appendix/comment_1_9bcf18e2bbe04bf5321e4fc33cca577c._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="mih" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f881df265a423e4f24eff27c623148fd" + subject="Status of the import/export protocol implementation" + date="2023-04-07T09:17:21Z" + content=""" +As of now, the protocol specification states \"This part is a draft, not implemented yet.\" To which degree is this still true? Would it be possible to implement a custom remote that implements (some of) these features, and have git-annex use it in an importtree=yes,exporttree=yes scenario? +"""]]