From c45c4fd8979ac4323308d86ad75895f77210644d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:20:42 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...ment_1_8137d887bd81e6841d449e0b68348395._comment | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Does___96__fsck_--more__96___imply___96__--incremental__96____63__/comment_1_8137d887bd81e6841d449e0b68348395._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Does___96__fsck_--more__96___imply___96__--incremental__96____63__/comment_1_8137d887bd81e6841d449e0b68348395._comment b/doc/forum/Does___96__fsck_--more__96___imply___96__--incremental__96____63__/comment_1_8137d887bd81e6841d449e0b68348395._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ffab739480 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Does___96__fsck_--more__96___imply___96__--incremental__96____63__/comment_1_8137d887bd81e6841d449e0b68348395._comment @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2025-03-26T14:18:02Z" + content=""" +No, interrupting will never lose previous incremental progress. In fact, if +you interrupt `--more` and run the same command again, it will skip all +files that were recorded as checked already by the first `--more`. + +I suspect you were reading a previous version of the man page, which +discussed being interrupted under `--incremental`. That wording was +recently adjusted. +"""]]