respond
This commit is contained in:
parent
5fd398ed72
commit
c2b979c550
1 changed files with 7 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
|
|||
It's very confusing to me that the same repo viewed from different client systems can have different names and descriptions. This implies that making changes to a remote repo from one system only affects how that system sees the repo, but it seems to affect how the entire git-annex "pair" or "network of repos" sees it.
|
||||
|
||||
I think it would be good if the names and descriptions of repos were synced across clients.
|
||||
|
||||
> The descriptions of repositories are synced. (They're stored in git-annex:uuid.log)
|
||||
>
|
||||
> git allows for the same repository to be referred to using as many different remote names as you want to set up. git-annex inherits this,
|
||||
> and I can't see this changing; there are very good reasons for remotes to
|
||||
> have this flexability. [[done]]
|
||||
> --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue