From c086c09ee14dc9682ea888d599155e9d40cbb10b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:19:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_1_47c254cec58cbbb3ea84c93ef8282f01._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/free_space_checking_for_local_special_remotes/comment_1_47c254cec58cbbb3ea84c93ef8282f01._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/free_space_checking_for_local_special_remotes/comment_1_47c254cec58cbbb3ea84c93ef8282f01._comment b/doc/todo/free_space_checking_for_local_special_remotes/comment_1_47c254cec58cbbb3ea84c93ef8282f01._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..00c4c56254 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/free_space_checking_for_local_special_remotes/comment_1_47c254cec58cbbb3ea84c93ef8282f01._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="4.154.7.235" + subject="comment 1" + date="2013-07-11T16:19:26Z" + content=""" +Directory special remotes do already honor annex.diskreserve, it turns out. Let's repurpose this bug to be about adding a per-remote configuration, in case the main annex.diskreserve is not appropriate. +"""]]